Reading the Sky, Documenting the Word: Methodological Intersections of Cultural Astronomy and Linguistic Fieldwork
Main Article Content
Abstract
This review examines the methodological intersections between cultural astronomy and linguistic fieldwork, arguing that these disciplines share foundational epistemological and practical commitments that remain undertheorized as a unified research program. Cultural astronomy, encompassing archaeoastronomy and ethnoastronomy, investigates how human societies perceive, interpret, and operationalize celestial phenomena. Linguistic fieldwork documents languages through systematic observation, elicitation, and recording within community contexts. Despite parallel development and shared reliance on ethnographic methods, these fields often proceed in isolation, overlooking synergies that emerge when the sky is approached as a semantic domain and language is recognized as a repository of astronomical knowledge. Drawing on recent scholarship in semantic typology, linguistic relativity, and Indigenous astronomy, this review identifies three primary points of convergence: (1) shared ethnographic commitments to community engagement and ethical knowledge production; (2) complementary elicitation techniques for documenting celestial terminology, narrative, and grammatical features; and (3) the co-constitutive relationship between linguistic categories and astronomical cognition, evidenced in event-based time systems, absolute spatial reference, and evidential marking. The Ethiopian Mekdes case and the Bororo ethnography illustrate how celestial phenomena authorize speech acts and structure social organization. The review concludes that an integrated methodological framework would enhance both fields by treating celestial vocabulary as linguistic data and grammatical categories as astronomical evidence, while centering Indigenous data sovereignty and the right to withhold knowledge. Such integration demands rigorous documentation and ethical accountability to knowledge-holding communities.
Article Details
How to Cite
Goshu, B. S., & Muhammad Ridwan. (2026). Reading the Sky, Documenting the Word: Methodological Intersections of Cultural Astronomy and Linguistic Fieldwork. LingLit Journal Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature, 7(3), 234-251. Retrieved from https://biarjournal.com/index.php/linglit/article/view/1620
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Penulis.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
References
Au, T. K. (1989). Methodological problems in cross-cultural studies of linguistic relativity. Cognition, 31(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90021-8
Bohnemeyer, J. (2011). Semantic typology as an approach to mapping the nature-nurture divide in cognition [White paper]. National Science Foundation. https://ubir.buffalo.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10477/38689/Bohnemeyer_Juergen_95.pdf
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748
Boutsikas, E., McCluskey, S. C., & Steele, J. (Eds.). (2021). Advancing cultural astronomy: Studies in honour of Clive Ruggles. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64606-6
Cardoso, W. (2017). Astronomy among the Tukano: Observational methods and collaborative documentation. [Manuscript referenced in Tukano et al., 2019].
Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J. D., Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043
Carroll, S. R., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., & Martinez, A. (2019). Indigenous data governance: Strategies from United States native nations. Data Science Journal, 18(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-031
Chen, J.-Y. (2007). Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104(2), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.012
CSIRO. (2024). A framework for preserving Aboriginal astronomy in South East Queensland. Australian Telescope National Facility. https://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/colearnia/public/A_Framework_for_Preserving_Aboriginal_Astronomy_in_South_East_Queensland.pdf
Da Silva Sinha, V. (2018). Event-based time in three indigenous Amazonian and Xinguan cultures and languages [Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia].
Da Silva Sinha, V. (2018). Event-based time in three indigenous Amazonian and Xinguan cultures and languages [Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12345.67890
Damjanovic, B. (2026). Beyond data extraction: Reflexivity and responsibility in linguistic fieldwork. In REFLECT: Reflective Ethnographic Fieldwork on Languages Enhancing Collaboration and Training [Workshop programme]. University of Helsinki.
Evans, N. (2010). Dying words: Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Wiley-Blackwell.
Fabian, S. M. (1992). Space-time of the Bororo of Brazil. University Press of Florida.
Floyd, R. (1993). The structure of Wanka Quechua evidential categories [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego].
Goshu, B. S., & M. Ridwan. (2026). Celestial categories: How languages encode, structure, and transmit astronomical knowledge across cultures. Lakhomi Journal Scientific Journal of Culture, 7(1), 42-60. Retrieved from https://biarjournal.com/index.php/lakhomi/article/view/1496
Goshu, B. S., & Ridwan, M. (2025). Diglossia, reproach, and celestial time: Indigenous astronomy as a framework for understanding Ethiopian verbal character. Journal of Language and Literature, 15(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20019060
Goto, A. (2017). Astronomical anthropology as neo-science [Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Project No. 26370967]. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/ja/file/KAKENHI-PROJECT-26370967/26370967seika.pdf
Goto, A. (2019). The planetarium as a representation space of anthropological knowledge: Diversity of skylore of the Japanese archipelago [Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Project No. 17K03299]. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/report/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17K03299/17K032992019jisseki
Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge University Press.
Holbrook, J. (2012). Cultural astronomy for linguists. In N. Thieberger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork (pp. 345–367). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571888.013.0016
Holbrook, J. (2008). Cultural astronomy: A conversation about degree programs and research questions from both sides of the pond [Conference presentation]. Space Telescope Science Institute. https://www.stsci.edu/institute/conference/youthae/PastSpeakers/JaritaHolbrookArticleonYAEPastSpeakersWebsite.July.2008.pdf
Hugh-Jones, S. (1979). The palm and the Pleiades: Initiation and cosmology in northwest Amazonia. Cambridge University Press.
International Astronomical Union. (2026, February 12). IAU selects new star names to reflect global astronomical culture. https://www.iau.org/IAU/Iau/News/Ann2026/New-Star-Names-2026.aspx
Iwaniszewski, S. (2010). Por una astronomía cultural renovada [In praise of a renewed cultural astronomy]. Complutum, 20(2), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CMPL.2009.v20.n2.21010
Kubanyiova, M. (2025). Ethical considerations and good practices in linguistic work on endangered languages: The case of a research programme on Cypriot Arabic. Linguistics, 63(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2024-0055
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press.
National Health and Medical Research Council. (2018). Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders. Commonwealth of Australia.
Nuckolls, J. B. (1993). The semantics of certainty in Quechua and its implications for a cultural epistemology. Language in Society, 22(2), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017095
Pepinsky, T. (2022). On Whorfian socioeconomics. Language, *98*(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2022.0001
Ruggles, C. L. N. (2015). Handbook of archaeoastronomy and ethnoastronomy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8
Sakel, J., & Everett, D. L. (2012). Linguistic fieldwork: A student guide. Cambridge University Press.
Shirakatsi, A. (1979). Matenagrut'yun [Writings of Anania of Shirak] (A. G. Abrahamyan, Ed.). Armenian Academy of Sciences. (Original work published 7th century CE)
Sparavigna, A. C., & Marazzato, R. (2023). The interview as instrument in cultural astronomy research. Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 26(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.2023.03.06
Thieberger, N. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571888.001.0001
Tukano, D., Desana, & Tuyuka. (2019). Astronomical constellations according to the Tukano. Avá: Revista de Antropología, 35, 1–20.
University of Helsinki. (2025, May 12). Thoughts on Indigenous Studies methodologies and their place in the context of linguistic fieldwork [Workshop presentation]. Kielitieteen päivät – Finnish Conference of Linguistics 2025. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/activities/thoughts-on-indigenous-studies-methodologies-and-their-place-in-t
Wardell, S. (2025). Ethnographic questioning, ethnographic listening. In Ethnography (pp. 89–110). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003404880-6
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J. B. Carroll, Ed.). MIT Press.
Bohnemeyer, J. (2011). Semantic typology as an approach to mapping the nature-nurture divide in cognition [White paper]. National Science Foundation. https://ubir.buffalo.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10477/38689/Bohnemeyer_Juergen_95.pdf
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748
Boutsikas, E., McCluskey, S. C., & Steele, J. (Eds.). (2021). Advancing cultural astronomy: Studies in honour of Clive Ruggles. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64606-6
Cardoso, W. (2017). Astronomy among the Tukano: Observational methods and collaborative documentation. [Manuscript referenced in Tukano et al., 2019].
Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J. D., Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043
Carroll, S. R., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., & Martinez, A. (2019). Indigenous data governance: Strategies from United States native nations. Data Science Journal, 18(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-031
Chen, J.-Y. (2007). Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104(2), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.012
CSIRO. (2024). A framework for preserving Aboriginal astronomy in South East Queensland. Australian Telescope National Facility. https://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/colearnia/public/A_Framework_for_Preserving_Aboriginal_Astronomy_in_South_East_Queensland.pdf
Da Silva Sinha, V. (2018). Event-based time in three indigenous Amazonian and Xinguan cultures and languages [Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia].
Da Silva Sinha, V. (2018). Event-based time in three indigenous Amazonian and Xinguan cultures and languages [Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12345.67890
Damjanovic, B. (2026). Beyond data extraction: Reflexivity and responsibility in linguistic fieldwork. In REFLECT: Reflective Ethnographic Fieldwork on Languages Enhancing Collaboration and Training [Workshop programme]. University of Helsinki.
Evans, N. (2010). Dying words: Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Wiley-Blackwell.
Fabian, S. M. (1992). Space-time of the Bororo of Brazil. University Press of Florida.
Floyd, R. (1993). The structure of Wanka Quechua evidential categories [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego].
Goshu, B. S., & M. Ridwan. (2026). Celestial categories: How languages encode, structure, and transmit astronomical knowledge across cultures. Lakhomi Journal Scientific Journal of Culture, 7(1), 42-60. Retrieved from https://biarjournal.com/index.php/lakhomi/article/view/1496
Goshu, B. S., & Ridwan, M. (2025). Diglossia, reproach, and celestial time: Indigenous astronomy as a framework for understanding Ethiopian verbal character. Journal of Language and Literature, 15(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20019060
Goto, A. (2017). Astronomical anthropology as neo-science [Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Project No. 26370967]. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/ja/file/KAKENHI-PROJECT-26370967/26370967seika.pdf
Goto, A. (2019). The planetarium as a representation space of anthropological knowledge: Diversity of skylore of the Japanese archipelago [Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Project No. 17K03299]. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/report/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17K03299/17K032992019jisseki
Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge University Press.
Holbrook, J. (2012). Cultural astronomy for linguists. In N. Thieberger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork (pp. 345–367). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571888.013.0016
Holbrook, J. (2008). Cultural astronomy: A conversation about degree programs and research questions from both sides of the pond [Conference presentation]. Space Telescope Science Institute. https://www.stsci.edu/institute/conference/youthae/PastSpeakers/JaritaHolbrookArticleonYAEPastSpeakersWebsite.July.2008.pdf
Hugh-Jones, S. (1979). The palm and the Pleiades: Initiation and cosmology in northwest Amazonia. Cambridge University Press.
International Astronomical Union. (2026, February 12). IAU selects new star names to reflect global astronomical culture. https://www.iau.org/IAU/Iau/News/Ann2026/New-Star-Names-2026.aspx
Iwaniszewski, S. (2010). Por una astronomía cultural renovada [In praise of a renewed cultural astronomy]. Complutum, 20(2), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CMPL.2009.v20.n2.21010
Kubanyiova, M. (2025). Ethical considerations and good practices in linguistic work on endangered languages: The case of a research programme on Cypriot Arabic. Linguistics, 63(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2024-0055
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press.
National Health and Medical Research Council. (2018). Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders. Commonwealth of Australia.
Nuckolls, J. B. (1993). The semantics of certainty in Quechua and its implications for a cultural epistemology. Language in Society, 22(2), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017095
Pepinsky, T. (2022). On Whorfian socioeconomics. Language, *98*(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2022.0001
Ruggles, C. L. N. (2015). Handbook of archaeoastronomy and ethnoastronomy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8
Sakel, J., & Everett, D. L. (2012). Linguistic fieldwork: A student guide. Cambridge University Press.
Shirakatsi, A. (1979). Matenagrut'yun [Writings of Anania of Shirak] (A. G. Abrahamyan, Ed.). Armenian Academy of Sciences. (Original work published 7th century CE)
Sparavigna, A. C., & Marazzato, R. (2023). The interview as instrument in cultural astronomy research. Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 26(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.2023.03.06
Thieberger, N. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571888.001.0001
Tukano, D., Desana, & Tuyuka. (2019). Astronomical constellations according to the Tukano. Avá: Revista de Antropología, 35, 1–20.
University of Helsinki. (2025, May 12). Thoughts on Indigenous Studies methodologies and their place in the context of linguistic fieldwork [Workshop presentation]. Kielitieteen päivät – Finnish Conference of Linguistics 2025. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/activities/thoughts-on-indigenous-studies-methodologies-and-their-place-in-t
Wardell, S. (2025). Ethnographic questioning, ethnographic listening. In Ethnography (pp. 89–110). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003404880-6
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J. B. Carroll, Ed.). MIT Press.