Analyzing the Similarity between Abagusii and Judean Conception of God as Reflected in the Book of Ruth

  • Charles K. Moywaywa Department of Philosophy & Religious Studies, South Eastern Kenya University
  • Muhammad Ridwan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Keywords: Divine intervention; anthropocentricism; anthropomorphism; transcendence; immanence

Abstract

The belief that God, or the Supreme Being, is the source of all that exists is common among a wide range of African communities that still retain a good measure of their traditional religio-cultural heritage. The Abagusii of Western Kenya is one of the communities that has been exposed to and actually embraced the western culture. This notwithstanding, the Abagusii are still proud of their traditional  customs and still maintain a good measure of these practices, either in their original form or with modifications. In this paper we examine the influence of belief in God on the day-to-day activities of the Abagusii and assess the similarity of their religiosity with that of the Judeans as reflected in the book of Ruth. The purpose of this work is to contribute to the on-going debate on inculturation by projecting a trajectory that appreciates the authenticity of all cultures. In comparing the similarity between Abagusii and Judean conception of and interaction with the divine, this paper covers the following key areas: the nature and function of God, human limitations, the relationship between God and humans, the notion of divine intervention, and the influence of religious consciousness on the daily life of the community and its members. The author is cognizant that the Book of Ruth may not provide a comprehensive picture of the Judean concept of God.  But it provides a basis for a comparative study on the way community members utilized their religious awareness and identity to govern their daily lives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Diakhate, Babacar, (2020).cultural Diversity, Ethnocentrism and Terrorism in Mukoma wa Ngugi’s BlackStar Nairobi(2013). Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal, 367-373.
Dupuis Jacques (1997). Towards a Christian theology of pluralism, Maryknoll, Orbis.
Gafney, W. (2010). 'Ruth', in H. Page et al. (eds.), The Africana Bible: Reading Israel's scriptures from Africa and the African diaspora, Minneapolis, Fortress, pp. 249-254.
Getui, Mary ed. (1998). Theological Method & Aspects of Worship in African Christianity, Nairobi Acton.
Kemi, Anthony Emina, 2020. Ethno-religious conflict and the quest for peace in a plural society in Africa. Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal, 613-622.
Mbiti J. S. (1990). African Religions and Philosophy, London, Heinemann.
- (1986). Bible and Theology in African Christianity, Nairobi, OUP.
- (1970). Concepts of God in Africa, London, SPCK.
Mugambi, J. N. K. Guy, Michael R. (2009). Contextual Theology Across Cultures, Nairobi, Acton.
Mugambi, J. N. K. (2002). Christianity and African Culture, Bairobi, Acton.
- ed. (1990). A Comparative Study of Religions. Nairobi, NUP.
Oduyoye, M.A. (2004). People of faith and the challenge of HIV/AIDS, Ibadan, Sefer.
Ogot, Bethwell A. (1976). The Economic and Social History of East Africa, Nairobi, Kenya Literature Bureau.
Parton, O. M. ed. (1976). Breaking Barriers; A Report of the Fifth Assembly of World Council of Churches, Nairobi, 1975, London, S.P.C.K.
Phiri, I. A. (2006). 'Ruth', in T. Adeyemo (ed), Africa Bible commentary, pp. 319-324, World Alive Publishers, Nairobi.
Rahmatirad, Mabobeh, (2020). A review of the socio-cultural theory. Siasat Journal. 23-31.
Rothwell, J. (2004). In the Company of others. 2nd ed. New York, McGraw Hill.
Waliggo Johnmary (1986). Inculturation: Its Meanig and Urgency, Nairobi, St Paul Publication Africa.
Published
2021-02-28
How to Cite
Charles K. Moywaywa, & Muhammad Ridwan. (2021). Analyzing the Similarity between Abagusii and Judean Conception of God as Reflected in the Book of Ruth. Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal, 3(1), 257-262. https://doi.org/10.33258/biohs.v3i1.400