On the Methodology of Modern Russian Law

Main Article Content

Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov

Abstract

An analysis of modern Russian literature made it possible to identify two equally negative tendencies in the methodology of jurisprudence. The first is that legal scholars pay little attention to methodology; the second is in attempts to introduce new methods into the methodology that are not used in practice.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kozhevnikov, V. V. (2023). On the Methodology of Modern Russian Law. Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics, 3(1), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.33258/polit.v3i1.869
Section
Articles

References

Baranov Pavel Petrovich, Vereshchagin Viktor Yurievich, Kurbatov Vladimir Ivanovich. etc. Philosophy of law: textbook. Rostov n/a: Rostov jurid. Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2004. P. 3.
Baranov Vladimir Mikhailovich, Pershin Victor Borisovich, Baranova Marina Vladimirovna. Place and role of the method of materialistic dialectics in legal research // Philosophy of Law. 2007. No. 3. P. 10.
Bryzgalov Andrey Ivanovich. On some theoretical and methodological problems of legal science at the present stage // State and Law. 2004. No. 4. P. 17.
Chestnov Ilya Lvovich. Legal understanding in the era of postmodernity: monograph. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Institute of Foreign Economics. communications, economics and law, 2002.P.268.
Chetvernin Vladimir Alexandrovich. The concept of law and state. Introduction to the course of the theory of state and law. M.: Delo, 2003. P. 111.
Demidov Alexander Ivanovich. On the methodological situation in jurisprudence // Jurisprudence. 2001. No. 4. P. 16.
Evgeny Ivanovich Temnov. On the de-ideologization of methodological approaches in historical-political and state-legal research // State and Law. 1992. No. 3. P. 75.
Graham Lauren G. Natural science, philosophy and science of human behavior in the Soviet Union. M.: Politizdat, 1991. P. 15.
Kerimov Dzhangir Abasovich. Methodology of law: subject, functions, problems of philosophy of law: monograph. M.: Avanta+, 2000.P.22.
Korelsky Viktor Mikhailovich. Methods of the theory of state and law // Theory of state and law: textbook / ed. Viktor Mikhailovich Korelsky, Viktor Dmitrievich Perevalov. M.: Norma, 2000. Pp. 12–13.
Kapitsa Petr Leonidovich. Experiment. Theory. Practice. M.: Nauka, 1987. P. 132.
Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich. On the hermeneutic method in jurisprudence // Bulletin of the Omsk University. Law. T. 17. No. 1. Pp. 15-26.
Kozlihin Ilya Yurievich. On non-traditional approaches to law //Jurisprudence. 2006. No. 1 P. 31.
Martyshin Orest Vladimirovich. On the concept of a textbook on the theory of state and law // State and Law. 2002. No. 8. P. 66.
Polyakov Andrey Vasilievich. Petersburg School of Philosophy of Law and the Tasks of Modern Jurisprudence//Jurisprudence. 2000. No. 2. P. 4.
Problems of the general theory of law and state: textbook / ed. Vladik Sumbatovich Nersesyants. M .: Norma, Infra-M, 2002. P. 23.
Puchkov Oleg Alexandrovich. Theory of state and law: problems and prospects // Jurisprudence. 2001. No. 6. Pp. 5–6, 7.
Surilov Alexey Vasilievich. Theory of state and law: textbook. Kiev-Odessa: Vishcha School, 1989. P. 49-50.
Syrykh Vladimir Mikhailovich Logical foundations of the general theory of law in 2 volumes. M.: Yustitsinform, 2001. Vol. 1. Elemental composition. Pp.11, 188.
Syrykh Vladimir Mikhailovich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M.: Yustitsinform, 2001. P. 478.
Tarasov Nikolai Nikolaevich. Methodological problems of legal science. Ekaterinburg: Humanitarian University, 2001.P.7.
Valery Pavlovich Kokhanovsky, Vladimir Igorevich Przhlensky, Elena Alexandrovna Sergodeeva. Philosophy of science: textbook. Rostov n/a: March, 2005. Pp. 127–128.
Zhukov Vyacheslav Nikolaevich. Philosophy of law: textbook. Moscow: Algorithm, World of Philosophy, 2019. Pp. 37, 39.
Zvonareva Olga Sergeevna. On the civilizational approach in the theory of state and law//Jurisprudence. 2003. No. 4. P. 173.