Putin on Trial: The Reality of Heads of State Immunity before International Criminal Courts
Main Article Content
Abstract
The prosecution of serving heads of state before international criminal courts is still very challenging even though most of these courts do not recognise immunities for international crimes. While the recognition of head of state immunity before national and foreign domestic courts for international crimes is supported by customary international law, the recognition of immunities before international criminal courts is determined by the statute creating the court.. Consequently, while the Rome Statute creating the International Criminal Court (the ICC) does not recognise any form of immunity, the Malabo Protocol creating the African Criminal Court (the ACC) recognised the immunity of senior serving state officials for international crimes. Currently, the ICC is investigating the situation in Ukraine which may lead to the possible arrest of President Putin of Russia and his senior officials for crimes against humanity and war crimes committed when Russia invaded Ukraine. The article argues that prosecuting a serving president like Putin by the ICC may be similar to the Al Bashir case because it will be difficult to arrest and surrender him to the Court and also the fact that Russia is not state party to the Rome Statute. Consequently, the waiving of immunity before an international court is not enough; cooperation by the home state of the offender and other states is needed in matters arrest and surrender to the prosecuting court.
Article Details
References
Aghem, H. E. (2021).The AU Debacle with the ICC: The Creation of the African Criminal Court. International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS) Vol. 4, No. 2, 67-76.
Aghem, H. E. (November 2021). The ICC’s Appeals Chamber Judgment in the Jordan Case Regarding Al Bashir and Ntaganda Case: Victories for the Fights against Impunity and Immunity for Serious Crimes. Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, Vol.1, No.4, 150-156.
Akande, D. (2004) “International law Immunities and International Criminal court” 98 American Journal of International Law (AJIL) 407-433.
Akande, D. and Shah, S. (2011). Immunity of State officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts. European Journal of International Law (EJIL), Vol.21 No. 4, 815-852.
Aversano, D. (2006). Can the Pope be a Defendant in the American Court? The Grant of Head of State Immunity and the Judiciary’s Role to Answer this Question. Pace International Law Review Vol.18, 495-529.
Bates, Ed, (2007) State Immunity for Torture. Human Right Law Review (HRLR) 7, 651-680.
Biden calls Putin a butcher after meeting with Ukrainian refugees in Poland available at https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-putin-butcher-ukrainian-refugees-poland.amp accessed April 04, 2022.
Cassese, A. (2002). When May Senior State Officials Be Tried for International Crimes? Some Comments on the Congo v. Belgium Case .European Journal of International Law (EJIL) Vol.13 No.4, 853-875.
Chung Chi Cheung v. The King [1939] AC 160.
Djibouti v. France, (2008) ICJ Report 177. Case Concerning Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. Dube, A. & Nhlabatsi, S. (2016).The King can do no wrong: The impact of The Law Society of Swaziland v. Simelane NO & Others on constitutionalism. African Human Rights Law Journal 16, 265-282.
Democratic Republic of Congo v. Belgium, Judgment, I.C.J Reports 2002, P.3, 14 February 2002 (N0.121), also known as (Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000).
Dugard, J. (2005). Immunity, Human Rights and International Law Crimes. Journal of South African Law 482-488.
Ferencz, B.B. (1998). International Criminal Court: The Legacy of Nuremberg. Pace International Law Review Vol.10 203-235.
Gaeta, P. (2009). Does President Al Bashir Enjoy Immunity from Arrest? (2009) Journal of International Criminal Justice (JICJ) 7,315-332.
Gilmore, S.A. (2012) Immunity Disorder: The Conflict of Foreign Official Immunity and Human Rights Ligation. The George Washington Law Review Vol.80, 918-949.
Grosscup, S. (2004). The Trial of Slobodan Milosevic: The Demise of Head of State Immunity and the Specter of Victor’s Justice. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Vol.32.2, 355-381.
Koivu, V. (2001). Head of State Immunity v. Individual Criminal Responsibility under International Law. Finish Year Book of International Law, Vol.12, 305-330.
Kahan v Pakistan Federation, 2 KB 1003 (1951).
Khurts Bat v. The Investigating Judge of the German Federal Court [2011] EWHC 2029 (Admin); [2011] All ER (D) 293 (Jul); ILR 147 (2012), 633 [55-62].
Murphy, S.D. (2014). Immunity Ratione personae of Foreign Government Officials and Other Topics: The Sixty-Fifth Session of the International Law Commission. American Journal of International Law Vol.108, 41-57.
Nyathi v. MEC for Gauteng (CCT 19/07) [2008] ZACC 8 [18].
Protocol on Amendment to the Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights of the African Union available at:https://au.int/en/treaties/protocol-amendments-protocol-statute-african-court-justice-and-human-rights (the 2014 Malabo Protocol), accessed August 18 2021.
Rome Statute available at: https://www.icc-int/resource-library; Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court circulated as document A/CONF.183/9 of 17 July 1998 and came into force on 1 July 2002 (Rome Statute), available at: https://www.icc-int/resource-library, accessed August 07 2021.
R v. Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.3) [1999] UKHL 17, [2000]1 A.C.147.
States Parties to the Rome Statute available at: https://asp.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/Pages/the%20states%20parties%20to%20the%20rome%20statute.aspx, accessed March 08, 2022.
Tachiona v. Mugabe 169 F Supp 2d 259, 318-7 (SDNY 2001).
The Prosecutor v Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir No. ICC-02/05-01/09-302 06-07-2017 (2017).
The Situation in Ukraine, N0.ICC-02/02, 07 March 2022.
Vladimir Putin- Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin, accessed April 04, 2022.