Study of Maeterlinck's Interior in the Light of Absurdity

Main Article Content

Raouf Aminzadeh

Abstract

This   article is an attempt to focus on Interior by Maeterlinck in the light of Absurd tradition. Maeterlinck employed symbols to illuminate nature, spirituality, existence, and the innumerable and invisible forces that shape our existence. Maeterlinck uses symbolism to explore the theme of death that is omnipotent in everyday life. The Interior 's central theme is death. Maeterlinck generates suspense by juxtaposing the characters' uneasiness in the garden with the family's peace and ignorance within the house. In order to reach this aim, the researchers decide to explain the theatre of the Absurd and its elements. Maeterlinck distrust of language is shown in his distrust of words, using repetitions, silences, pauses and some other tactics. The existential theme and contents used in selected play are discussed. Themes such as: death, lack of individuality and lack of communication in mentioned play is discussed. Moreover, this article also contains a comparative study of the structure of the two.

Article Details

How to Cite
Raouf Aminzadeh. (2021). Study of Maeterlinck’s Interior in the Light of Absurdity. LingLit Journal Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature, 2(4), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.33258/linglit.v2i4.552
Section
Articles

References

Basirizadeh, Fatemeh. (2019). A Comparative Study of the Psychoanalytical Portrayal of the Women Charactersby Virginia Woolf and Zoya Pirzad. Britain International of Humanatis and Social Sciences Journal, 1-8
Basirizadeh, Fatemeh. Harati, Maryam. (2011). The Role of Metaphoric Language and its Analysis in TomStoppard’s the Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 25, Number 1.
Camus, Albert. (1961). The Myth of Sisyphus: And Other Essays. Random House.
Cuddon, Ed . J . A . (1979). A Dictionary of Literary Terms London: Penguin.
Esslin, Martin. (1982). The Theatre of the Absurd. London: Pelican.
Gale, Maggie B, and John F. Deeney. (2010). The Routledge Drama Anthology and Sourcebook: From Modernism to Contemporary Performance. London: Routledge. Print.
Innes, Christopher, and Christopher Innes. (1993). Avant Garde Theatre, 1892-1992. London: Routledge. Print.
Krasner, David. (2012). A History of Modern Drama. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wiley , UK.
Lehmann , Hans-Thies. (2006). Postdramatic Theatre. New York City: Routledge.
Lichte, Erika Fischer. (2002). History of European Drama and Theatre. New York City: Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data.
Maurice Maeterlinck, (1904). Théâtre II, Paris, p. 56.
Pronko, Leonard. (1962). Avant-Garde. Berkeiey, California: California UP.
Raoufzadeh, N. Basirizadeh, F. Zaheri birgani, Sh. (2019). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal. www.bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci
Richard Schechner. (1988). Performance Theory. Routledge.
Szondi, Peter, Michael Hays, and Jochen Schulte-Sasse. (1987). Theory of the Modern Drama: A Critical Edition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Print.