Analysis of Factors That Influence the Occurrence Of Corruption in the Perspective of Fraud Hexagon
Abstract
Fraud is a term that is often found in revealing frauds, both in the private and public sectors. The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), which is an anti-fraud organization, defines fraud as an unlawful act committed intentionally for personal or group gain and can harm other parties. ACFE categorizes fraud into three categories, namely corruption, misuse of assets, and financial statement fraud. Corruption, especially in the public sector, has become a familiar issue among the public because it is also related to the public's demand for transparency of public information. This study uses a quantitative research design with a causal associative approach. The data sources used in this study are the BPK Audit Report (LHP), the website of each provincial government, and KPK report data. The results of this study indicate that stimulus, collusion, and ego have a positive and significant influence so that the central government must provide more supervision for provincial governments that are financially independent, have high capital expenditurerealization, and provide a rejection response to the BPK audit results
Downloads
References
Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2018). Fraud prevention initiatives in the Nigerian public sector: Understanding the relationship of fraud incidences and the elements of fraud triangle theory. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(2), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2015-0008
ACFE. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to the nations. In Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon Fraud: Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013
Adhivinna, V. V., & Agustin, A. P. (2021). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Kesesuaian Kompensasi Dan Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Potensi Kecurangan Dana Desa Pada Kelurahan/Desa di Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan: PRIVE, 4 (2)(September), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v1i3.154
Ahriati, D., Basuki, P., & Widiastuty, E. (2015). Analisis Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Perilaku Tidak Etis dan Kesesuaian Kompensasi terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Jurnal InFestasi, 11(1), 41–55.
Ainiyah, L. N., & Effendi, D. (2022). Pengaruh Hexagon Fraud Theory Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Perusahaan Manufak-Tur Sub Sektor Food and Beverage yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia 2016-2020). Jurnal Ilmu Dan RiseT, 11(10), 1–20.
Arifah, D. A. (2012). Praktek Teori Agensi Pada Entitas Publik Dan Non Publik. Prestasi, 9(1), 85–95.
Azhar, K., & Setyaningrum, D. (2015). The Effect of Audit Findings and Follow up of Audit Recomendation on Corruption of Ministries / Institutions in Indonesia View project Good Public Governance, Corruption and Public Service Quality: Indonesia Evidence. AAAA Annual Conference, November 2015.
Bartenputra, A. (2016). Pengaruh kesesuaian kompensasi, ketaatan akuntansi dan asimetri informasi terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(2)(March), 1–26.
Cressey, D. R. (1950). The Criminal Violation of Financial Trust. American Sociological Review, 15(6), 738–743.
Crowe Horwath. (2011). The Mind Behind The Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Element.
Essing, S. A., Saerang, D. P. E., & Lambey, L. (2017). Analisis Pelaksanaan Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK RI atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Kabupaten Kepulauan Talaud. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing “Goodwill,” 8(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.35800/jjs.v8i1.15331
Fadly, A., Wahyudi, I., & Yetti, S. (2020). Pengaruh Fraud Diamond Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Kabupaten Dan Kota Di Provinsi Jambi Periode 2014 –2018. Jambi Accounting Review, 1(2), 139–151.
Fitri, F., & Nadirsyah. (2020). Pengaruh Tekanan (Pressure), Kesempatan (Opportunity), Rasionalisasi (Rationalization), dan Kapabilitas (Capability) Terhadap Pengadaan Barang / Jasa. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 5(1), 69–84.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 (Edisi ke-9). Universitas Diponegoro.
Handayani, N., Evana, E., & Prasetyo, T. J. (2022). Determination of Fraudulent Financial Statements in Indonesia. Journal Dimensie Management and Public Sector, 3(2), 01–10. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjef.2022.v06i02.002
Harmanto, A. (2015). Pengaruh Karakteristik Kepala Daerah dan Partai Politik Pendukung Eksekutif Terhadap Indikasi Korupsi Belanja Perjalanan Dinas (Studi Empiris Data Gabungan pada Pemerintah Daerah di Pulau Jawa-Bali Tahun 2010 s.d 2013). Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Isnadiva, S. M., & Haryanto. (2021). Hasil Pemeriksaan dan kasus Korupsi pada Pemerintah Daerah Studi pada Pemerintah Provinsi di Indonesia Tahun 2015-2018. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9 (1)(April), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v9i1.28342
Klitgaard, R. E. (1988). Controlling Corruption. University of California Press.
Maria, E. (2019). Faktor Risiko Fraud Pemerintah Daerah, Indonesia: Bukti Empiris Pengajuan Model Teori Fraud Triangle dan Teori Fraud Diamond. Universitas Gajah Mada.
Maria, E., & Halim, A. (2021a). E-Government dan Korupsi: Studi di Pemerintah Daerah, Indonesia dari Perspektif Teori Keagenan. Ekuitas: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 5(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2021.v5.i1.4789
Maria, E., & Halim, A. (2021b). Public Governance Dan Korupsi: Bukti Pengujian Dari Indonesia Menggunakan Perspektif Teori Keagenan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(3), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.11.3.223-234
Maria, E., Halim, A., & Suwardi, E. (2018). Eksplorasi Faktor Tekanan untuk Melakukan Fraud di Pemerintah Daerah Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Publik, 1(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.32554/jap.v1.i1.p111-126
Maria, E., Halim, A., Suwardi, E., & Miharjo, S. (2019). Exploration Opportunities To Commit Fraud in Local Governments, Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 16(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2019.01
Masni, E. P., & Sari, V. F. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Kesesuaian Kompensasi, Pengendalian Internal, dan Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kecurangan Dana Desa. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 5(1), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v5i1.729
Masyitoh, R. D., Wardhani, R., & Setyanigrum, D. (2015). Pengaruh Opini Audit, Temuan Audit, dan Tindak Lanjut Hasil Audit terhadap Persepsi Korupsi pada Pemerintah Daerah Tingkat II Tahun 2008-2010. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 17 (100), 1–26.
Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00025-5
Muhtar, Sutaryo, & Sriyanto. (2018). Corruption in Indonesian local government: Study on triangle fraud theory. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(2), 536–552.
Mulyani, P., & Suryawati, R. F. (2011). Analisis Peran Dan Fungsi Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (Spip/Pp No.60 Tahun 2008) Dalam Meminimalisasi Tingkat Salah Saji Pencatatan Akuntansi Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Organisasi Dan Manajemen, 7(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.33830/jom.v7i2.95.2011
Novita, N. (2019). Teori Fraud Pentagon dan Deteksi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer, 11(2), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.33508/jako.v11i2.2077
Nuruddinia, M., & Rahmawati, I. P. (2021). Fraud Triangle dan Korupsi Pada Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Komputerisasi Akuntansi (JRAK), 12(1), 110–124.
Purnaningsih, N. K. C. (2022). Fraudulent Financial Reporting Analysis on Non-Financial Companies Listed on IDX in Hexagon Fraud Perspective. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal), 11331–11343.
https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.4955
Putra, M. N. D., Basri, Y. M., & Indrawati, N. (2021). Mitigasi Terjadinya Kecurangan di Sektor Pemerintahan Melalui Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory. SAR (Soedirman Accounting Review): Journal of Accounting and Business, 6(2), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.32424/1.sar.2021.6.2.5583
Ritonga, I. T., Clark, C., & Wickremasinghe, G. (2012). Assessing Financial Condition of Local Government in Indonesia : an Exploration. Public and Municipal Finance, 1(2), 37–50.
Rosifa, D., & Supriatna, I. (2022). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Kecurangan pada Pengelolaan Dana Desa (Survei pada Pemerintahan Desa di Kabupaten Bandung Barat). Indonesian Accounting Research Journal, 2(3), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.35313/iarj.v2i3.4117
Rustiarini, N. W., Sutrisno, S., Nurkholis, N., & Andayani, W. (2019). Fraud triangle in public procurement: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(4), 951–968. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2018-0121
Sari, M. P., Mahardika, E., Suryandari, D., & Raharja, S. (2022). The audit committee as moderating the effect of hexagon’s fraud on fraudulent financial statements in mining companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2150118
Sonbay, Y. Y. (2022). Kritik Terhadap Pemberlakuan Teori Agensi Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa Di Suku Boti. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2022.v6.i2.5176
Sulistiyowati, F. (2007). Pengaruh Kepuasan Gaji dan Kultur Organisasi Terhadap Persepsi Aparatur Pemerintah Daerah tentang Tindak Korupsi. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 11(1), 47–66.
Suryandari, E., & Pratama, L. V. (2021). Determinan Fraud Dana Desa: Pengujian Elemen Fraud Hexagon, Machiavellian, dan Love of Money. Reviu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 5(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.18196/rabin.v5i1.11688
Suryandari, N. P. E., Wahyuni, M. A., & Julianto, I. P. (2019). Pengaruh Tekanan, Kesempatan, Rasionalisasi (Triangle) dan Efektivitas Penerapan Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Tindak Kecurangan (Fraud) (Studi pada LPD Se-Kecamatan Negara). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 10(1), 1–10.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
Wicaksono, G. S., & Prabowo, T. J. W. (2022). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Korupsi pada Pemerintah Daerah di Jawa Tengah Menggunakan Teori Fraud Triangle. Owner, 6(1), 1016–1028. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i1.710
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. CPA Journal, 12, 38–42