Analysis of Compensation, Motivation, Level of Stress on Work Performance in PT. Mitra Agung Mustika

  • Bobby Surya Darma Fakultas Sosial Sains, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia
  • Dewi Nurmasari Pane Fakultas Sosial Sains, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia
  • Ocdy Amelia Fakultas Sosial Sains, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/biohs.v4i3.762
Keywords: compensation; motivation; stress levels; job performance

Abstract

This study uses a quantitative model that is the population here the researcher uses all employees that occur in PT. Mitra Agung Mustika numbered 31 respondents and here the business owner or owner is not included in my respondents so the sample I use is saturated sample, meaning all that is the population appointed as a sample. sampling is all employees in the company PT. Mitra Agung Mustika. The data used is primary data, and based on the distribution of questionnaires and distribution of questionnaires to respondents or all employees. The result of F test yielded Fhitung22.572> Ftabel 2.97 so that Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected, meaning compensation, Motivation, Stress level affect Job Performance. Until the previous hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. And the result of the calculation for the variables of compensation, motivation and stress level with SPSS obtained a result of 68.3% and the remaining 31.7% of the overall effect of variable X on Y.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, S. (2018). Analisa faktor faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja karyawan. Jiaganis, 3 (1).
Ardana. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu
Arif, S. (2019). Influence of Leadership, Organizational Culture, Work Motivation, and Job Satisfaction of Performance Principles of Senior High School in Medan City. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 239-254
Creswell, J. (2015). Reserch Design Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan
Deddy Mulyadi. (2015). Perilaku Organisasi Dan Kepemimpinan Pelayanan (Konsep Dan Aplikasi Administrasi ,Manajemen , Dan Organisasi Modern Framont
Edy Sutrisno, (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetak Ke Enam.Pranada Media Group, Jakarta.
Hasibuan (2011). Malayu. Manajemen Dasar,Pengertian Dan Masalah. Jakarta Gramedia
Indisari, D (2013). Konsep manajemen syariah (Dalam pengupahan karyawan perusahaan).jurnal manajemen, 2(2), &-13
Kontesa, Meria, (2014). Hubungan Gaya Kepemimpinan Kepala Ruangan dengan Motivasi Kerja di RSUD Dr. Rasipin Padang Tahun 2014. Jurnal STIKES Mercubaktijaya Padang
Larasati, S. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Deepublish.
Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Rosdakarya
Manullang. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen. Yogyakarta: Gadjah MadaMixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Niati, D. R., Siregar, Z. M. E., & Prayoga, Y. (2021). The Effect of Training on Work Performance and Career Development: The Role of Motivation as Intervening Variable. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 2385–2393. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1940
Suryani, N. K., & Yoga, G. A. D. M. (2019). Konflik dan stres kerja dalam organisasi. Widya Manajemen, 1 (1), 99-113.
Triatna,Cepi. (2015). Perilaku Organisasi. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ulber, Silalahi. (2011). Asas Asas Manajemen. Bandung: Refika Aditama University Press.
Veithzal Rivai, (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya untuk Perusahaan, PT.Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta
Published
2022-10-12
How to Cite
Bobby Surya Darma, Dewi Nurmasari Pane, & Ocdy Amelia. (2022). Analysis of Compensation, Motivation, Level of Stress on Work Performance in PT. Mitra Agung Mustika. Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal, 4(3), 411-419. https://doi.org/10.33258/biohs.v4i3.762
Issue
Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences, October
Section
Articles