The Influence of Leadership and Motivation on Lecturer Performance
Abstract
This research was conducted to determine the effect leadership and motivation for the performance of lecturers at the faculty of Islamic religion at the University of Singaperbangsa Karawang, the object of research is all lecturers at the Faculty of Islamic Religion, Singapore University with a total of 34, the data collection technique uses a questionnaire. The results showed that the relationship between the independent variables, namely between X1 and X2, showed a correlation of 0.876, this shows that leadership and motivation at the Faculty of Islamic Religion, Singapore University have a strong relationship, meaning that leadership can encourage motivation. v Partial effect between leadership variables on performance amounting to 0.253. with the results of hypothesis testing, the level of significance is 0.012 <α (0.05), which means that there is a significant influence between leadership and performance. The partial effect of the motivation variable on performance is 0.737 with the results of testing the hypothesis with a significance level of 0.00 <α (0.05), which means that there is a significant influence between leadership and performance. The joint influence between leadership and motivation variables on performance is shown by the direct influence and indirect influence between leadership and performance by 22.7%, while between motivation and performance is 70.6%. So the overall leadership and motivation variables for performance are 93.3% ((RYX) 2). The joint influence between leadership and motivation variables on performance is shown by the direct influence and indirect influence between leadership and performance by 22.7%, while between motivation and performance is 70.6%. So the overall leadership and motivation variables for performance are 93.3% ((RYX) 2). The joint influence between leadership and motivation variables on performance is shown by the direct influence and indirect influence between leadership and performance by 22.7%, while between motivation and performance is 70.6%. So the overall leadership and motivation variables for performance are 93.3% ((RYX) 2).
Downloads
References
Cahyono, A. (2012). Analisa pengaruh kepemimpinan, motivasi dan budaya organisasi terhadap kinerja dosen dan karyawan di Universitas Pawyatan Daha Kediri. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Revitalisasi, 1(1), 283-298.
Christianingsih, E. (2011). Manajemen Mutu Perguruan Tinggi (Studi tentang Kpemimpinan Visioner dan Kinerja Dosen terhadap Mutu Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Kota Bandung). Manajerial: Jurnal Manajemen dan Sistem Informasi, 10(1), 31-41.
Ikhsan, A. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Non Dosen Pada Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis Mercu Buana, 2(1), 97055.
Jufrizen, J., Farisi, S., Azhar, M. E., & Daulay, R. (2020). Model Empiris Organizational Citizenship Behavior dan Kinerja Dosen Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Medan. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan), 4(2), 145-165.
Noor, W., & Juhji, J. (2020). Integrasi Budaya Prestasi pada Fungsi Perencanaan Pembinaan Mutu Dosen. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 1-12.
Pangaribuan, W. (2017). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Komitmen Organisasi, Komunikasi Interpersonal, dan Efektivitas Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Kinerja terhadap Kinerja Dosen (Doctoral dissertation, UNIMED).
Prawira, W., & Yogie, R. (2018). Marketing Communication On The Environment Protection On Annual Haze Smoke In Riau Province (No. 7208579). International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
Siagian, SondangP. (2002). Organizational Apparatus Ability and Administrative Behavior. Jakarta GA
Sugiono. (2006). Administrative Research Methods. Alfabeta, Bandung.
Sutrisno. 2009. Human Resource Management. Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Ujang Charda, S. (2011). Peranan Pendidikan Tinggi Hukum Dalam Memenuhi Tuntutan Dunia Kerja. Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, 24(01).
Umar, Husein. 2005. Human Resource Research in Organizations. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Usman, H. and R. Purnomo. SA 2003. Introduction to Statistics. Balai Aksara, Jakarta.
Wahjosumidjo. (2001). Leadership Head School Review theoretical And The problem. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
.png)
_.gif)
_.gif)
